Yes, that's true - I guess that never bothered me ... until now, that is, now that you mention it, thank you very much. Quite possibly that is easy to fix though - I'll look into that asap.
Maybe I should add that, while I like producing aesthetically pleasing lead sheets, my first priority has always been to produce sheets that serve the performer. And LilyJazz - with or without jazzy accidentals - does provide output that is superbly readable even in shady, dim conditions. Only last week I played in a bar, and the sheets provided had chord names the size of a fine-print edition of the bible. I practically had to kiss the music stand the whole gig through ... Cheers, Robert > Hi Robert, > >> It is possible though that all tools for doing that are already present in >> LilyJazz ... I simply don't remember now. > > Sorry, I wasn’t clear: the accidentals in your chord names aren’t using the > LilyJazz font, as far as I can tell, whereas the rest of the glyphs (e.g., > letters, numbers) are. > > Cheers, > Kieren. > ________________________________ > > Kieren MacMillan, composer > ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info > ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user