Yep, much smarter Phil.
2016-02-10 14:40 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>:
> Better would be to add \tweak X-extent #'(0 . 0) just before the C major
> key sig in the right hand?
>
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: Pierre Perol-Schneider
> To: N. Andrew Walsh
> Cc: lilypond-user
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1:19 PM
> Subject: Re: "bitonal" key signatures
>
>
>
> ... but is probably not the "better" way!
>
>
>
> 2016-02-10 14:18 GMT+01:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <
> pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
>
> In lhMusic mes.2 try :
> ...
> \tweak X-extent #'(0 . 0)
> \tweak extra-offset #'(-3 . 0)
> \key es \major
> ....
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pierre
>
>
>
>
> 2016-02-10 13:36 GMT+01:00 N. Andrew Walsh <n.andrew.wa...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi List (again),
>
> here's another question, more general: I have a piano part in which the
> upper voice is to have one key signature, the lower to retain another one
> (namely, the right hand has \key c \major, while the left hand has \key es
> \major, which was also declared at the start of the piece). Something like
> this:
>
>
> \version "2.19.36"
>
>
>
>
> beambreakOn = {
> \set subdivideBeams = ##t
> \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8)
> \set beatStructure = #'(2 2 2 2)
> }
>
>
> beambreakOff = {
> \set subdivideBeams = ##f
> \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8)
> \set beatStructure = #'(2 2 2 2)
> }
>
>
> rhMusic = \relative c'' {
> \key es \major
> \time 4/8
> r16 bes d bes d bes d bes |
> \key c \major
> \beambreakOn \tuplet 3/2 { es,\( f g } \tuplet 3/2 { a b cis } dis4\) |
> }
>
>
> lhMusic = \relative c {
> \clef bass
> \key es \major
> \time 4/8
> <<
> { r16 d f d f d f d | }
> \\
> { bes2 | }
> >>
> \key es \major
> <<
> { es,16 bes' es bes g' d g d | }
> \\
> { es,2 | }
> >>
> }
>
>
> \score {
>
>
> \new PianoStaff <<
> \new Staff = "RH" <<
> \rhMusic
> >>
> \new Staff = "LH" <<
> \lhMusic
> >>
> >>
> }
> ------------
>
> My issue is as follows: the engraver in charge of key signatures is
> displacing that second "\key es \major" expression in the left hand,
> presumably because there was already one in place from the beginning (or
> perhaps because it's assuming a possible collision with the "\key c \major"
> expression in the right hand). In either case, what I would prefer is that
> both new key signatures are not displaced horizontally, so that the second
> "\key es \major" is, in effect, merely a cautionary repetition of the one
> from the start and aligned underneath the naturals of the "\key c \major"
> expression in the right hand.
>
>
>
> Is there a better way to do this?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> A
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
