Graham,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Graham King-4 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n188622...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Following on from an earlier thread[1], I have a snippet, below, that uses
> a repeat to create a "D.C. al fine" structure.
>
> The snippet throws two warnings: "cannot end volta spanner" that appear to
> be caused by the "\set Score.repeatCommands" line.
>
> Whilst I could just bludgeon these unwelcome messages with
> ly:expect-warning, the conscientious bit of me is asking the list whether
> they can be eliminated without hurting lilypond's feelings...
>
> \version "2.19.35"
>
> \repeat volta 2 {
> c''1
> \bar "|."
> \mark "Fine"
> }
> \alternative {
> {
> % Treat the "B" section as a first-time bar, but
> % suppress the "|1." label:
> \set Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta #f))
> c''1
> \bar "||"
> \mark "D.C."
> }
> { } % There is no "second-time bar".
> }
>
>
Some quick testing showed that using
\omit Score.VoltaBracket
instead of
\set Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta #f))
did the same thing without the warnings. I can't speak for how this would
affect scores outside your specific example, though.
HTH,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/D-C-al-fine-and-volta-spanner-errors-tp188622p188623.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com._______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
