On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 12:21:39 (+0200), Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 19.07.2016 06:07, Joel C. Salomon wrote: [...] > > a16( gs a gs a gs a gs \repeat tremolo 4 { a gs) } > > | \kluge | > > \voiceOne > > \repeat tremolo 4 { f( d } \repeat tremolo 4 { f d) } > > | \kluge | [...]
> As a side note: It’s considered bad practice to have tabs in > LilyPond source code. I'm afraid you're confusing two issues here. People can add any sort of whitespace that LP will accept into their LP source code. I think it ought to allow a greater selection too. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-05/msg00307.html OTOH the developers may choose to enforce a programming style for *program* code that's accepted into the official tree, and the same for the various subsidiary projects. That's no different from the Linux Kernel, GNU, Python, etc. There is a thread involving the main developers which starts at https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-04/msg00076.html but it's tedious to follow it to the bitter end, and there may be more recent discussions/guidelines. Personally, I avoid tabs myself except in human-only files, mainly because of the side-effects in python code where indentation is significant to the parser. But that's just me. As a side-side note, maybe the slur is the equivalent of the "Vaughan Williams quaver". RVW would tie to a quaver in the next bar, but here there's a chord in the way (which also means that here it's not a tie). It may just emphasise that the note must be sustained. Not being a pianist, I don't know which hand plays the quavers in the upper staff. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user