Am 19. Juli 2016 20:02:10 MESZ, schrieb David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk>: >On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 18:58:36 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote: >> Am 19. Juli 2016 18:11:14 MESZ, schrieb "Joel C. Salomon" ><joelcsalo...@gmail.com>: >> >On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote: >> >> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't >a >> >> connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the >> >> BarLine at the end of that measure that makes me wonder, but it's >> >only >> >> speculation at this point. Given the ending tip's vertical >position, >> >> too, it almost looks like it could be a slur. What does the next >bar >> >> look like? >> > >> >The next bar doesn’t have any partial ties or slurs. >> >> But is there an a or any other note that could reasonably be tied or >slurred to in the next measure? >> >> From my experience as editor this really looks like a broken tie or >slur where the engraver forgot to supply the second part. This happens >extremely often. >> >> Best would be an image of the next system. > >Attached. Every bar in the piece looks like the other three bars, >except for two cadences at which beat 4 is a crochet in the bass. >So IMHO it's to make sure the note is sustained right through the >bar, as this movement lacks any pedalling. A tie here wouldn't make >sense in the context.
Interestingly senseless, indeed. I'm 98% sure that's an engraving error of some kind that may be resolved by analogy. I'd have to see the full score ... Mind sending that (privately if you want) or a download link? Urs > >As I said in the other subthread, not being a pianist, I don't know >which hand plays the quavers in the upper staff and whether that has >implications for sustaining the note. > >Cheers, >David. -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user