On 8/5/16 7:50 AM, "Mark Knoop" <m...@opus11.net> wrote:

>At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Andrew Bernard
>>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether
>>> lilypond is
>>> ŒLilypond¹ or ŒLilyPond¹ or ŒLily Pond¹ or Œlilypond¹. That at least
>>> needs to be straightened out.
>>
>>LilyPond.  Check the front page of the website.
>
>$ git grep LilyPond Documentation/ | wc -l
>11154
>$ git grep Lilypond Documentation/ | wc -l
>329
>$ git grep "Lily Pond" Documentation/ | wc -l
>2

The name of the software package is LilyPond.  The name of the binary is
lilypond (so when you talk about the binary (e.g. talk about usage) you
use lilypond).  I have no idea about the Lily Pond usage; I'd guess that
is an error.

Thanks,

Carl


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to