Hello Johan, Last time I looked lilypond was part of the GNU project and it is open source software. It does not therefore participate or compete in commercial markets and it is not intended to. So you make a point that is difficult to understand.
If however you are discussing expanding the mindshare of lilypond in the music publishing world, then I hardly think the cosmetic appearance of a website is the most influential factor. That's a very shallow approach. Surely it must be the quality and engineering of the software itself that speaks for lilypond's virtues. Nobody has decreed the website to be set in stone. It is however constrained by certain considerations, such as accessibility, as is any website. Andrew -----Original Message----- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+andrew.bernard=gmail....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Johan Vromans Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 7:51 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: New LilyPond website If the web site must be cast in stone, then welcome back to the stone age. At least this will mootify further discussions about why LilyPond is not getting considered a serious competitor in the market. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
