On 11/29/2016 11:41 AM, Paul wrote: > On 11/29/2016 10:08 AM, Karlin High wrote: >> On 11/29/2016 4:47 AM, Urs Liska wrote: >>> But I would much more like to see it created by a static site >>> generator, in a system where the content can be managed as a Git >>> repository. >> I did a Google serach for "texinfo website generator." Here's one that >> reminds me of the LilyPond way of doing things. >> >> HAUNT: >> https://haunt.dthompson.us/ > Indeed, if we're talking static site generators, Haunt has a lot to > recommend it, especially because it's written in Guile/Scheme which > LilyPond devs/contributors know well. It works with texinfo. It's > functional (as in functional programming). It makes few assumptions, > is flexible, etc. > > The recently revamped Guile website now uses Haunt: > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
Really! I remember the Guile website got suggested before as a source of web design inspiration. (In the lilypond-user discussion "Potential improvements to the homepage?" begun by Andrew Yoon on August 21, 2016.) And, since the source for that is available on git - http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile/guile-web.git/ - there would be a starting point for making a web design workflow that integrates with LilyPond's existing workflows for writing documentation and translations. -- Karlin High Missouri, USA _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user