On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:19 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi David, > > > > > At the moment I cannot really see how to deal with this sort of > > problem, other than having completely separate input for the score > > and > > the part at these points, controlled by tags. But is there a > > better > > way - one which requires less duplication of material in the input? > > > > Any suggestions or pointers to help with this will be gratefully > > received! > If you search for ‘divisi’ on the list — and sort in reverse > chronological order (which really should be the default!) — you’ll > find many related threads, containing lots of hints and tips on how > to attack this problem (e.g., <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lily > pond-user/2016-08/msg00256.html>). > > Hope this helps, > Kieren.
It does - I simply hadn't thought of searching for "divisi"! Even after a cursory glance at some of the stuff that that search comes up with, I can see that this is going to be very helpful. Thanks David _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
