Orm Finnendahl <orm.finnend...@selma.hfmdk-frankfurt.de> writes: > Hi List, > > in the lilypond course at our school we encountered quite different > compile times for the attached score on Windows10 and linux. > > The hardware is i7 laptops with comparable cpus (6500U and 5500U). > > The measurements: > > Windows 10, 5500U, 8GB Ram, Frescobaldi, lilypond 2.18.2: 7.0 seconds > > Linux, 6500U, 20GB Ram, commandline, lilypond 2.19.48: 1.1 seconds > > To me a factor > 6 seems unlikely to be related to the hardware. On > the windows machine it hangs for quite a while during "preprocessing > graphical elements..." > > Does somene have similar experiences and could someone with a Windows > computer maybe compile the score and report back to the list so that > we can narrow down the culprit?
The culprit is likely broken font caching. Fixed in more recent versions. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
