2017-06-15 0:01 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org>: > That said, currently there are two distinct areas where any engagement > could be fruitful: > > A) > I'd be more than happy if someone could help me or take over the > implementation of the website. Currently it is written as a > (artificially crippled) Node/Angular application, but I'm having > difficulties populating the datasets on the Node side. > I'd be interested in continuing on that track, but I'd equally value a > completely new approach, for example based on a static site builder. >
I’d love to see openLilyLib go forward, and I’d love to be able to help where I can. Unfortunately, my available time is quite limited, but that can only get better over the coming months. So, I at least want to throw out there the Kirby CMS as a possible alternative to your present website setup. I gathered a little experience with it, building my own website, and I found it quite easy to use and very flexible. I love their file-based, no-database approach using Markdown syntax, which also makes it easily possible to deploy all content via Git (which I haven’t done yet, but I’d love to). It is open source, but you need a licence – the personal one should suffice, though. I don’t know if it would make things easier than with your current approach, but maybe something to look into? -- Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based in Mainz, Germany http://www.petercrighton.de
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
