-----Original Message----- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: 26 June 2017 13:43 To: Peter Gentry <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk> Cc: 'Gianmaria Lari' <gianmarial...@gmail.com>; Lilypond <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Subject: Re: : Re: transpose range
"Peter Gentry" <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk> writes: > You will need to modify the attach file (instrument_ranges.ly) since you are > only interested in one instrument. > > > > A numeric pitch can be constructed from three components of the > lilypond pitch p > > > > 1. The octave o obtained from (ly:pitch-octave p)) > 2. The note n obtained from (ly:pitch-notename p)) > 3. The semitone a obtained from the alteration (* 4 > (ly:pitch-alteration p)) note alteration is in quarter tone steps > > > > The numeric pitch (op) is calculated by (define op (+ (* 14 o) (* n 2) (/ a > 2))) “op is a unique number representing the pitch of the note” Uh, that's pretty bad since it sees eis as equal to fes. Anything wrong with just using (ly:pitch-tones p) instead? -- David Kastrup a. I had not heard of ly:pitch-tones p) b. for most folks eis is the same sound as fes. Neither my battered old ears or my tuner could detect the difference. 😊 _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
