On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 14:02 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > > Am 06.07.2017 um 20:37 schrieb Graham King: > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 18:17 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm wrapping up a number of things in openLilyLib, and I came across > >> snippets where the example files don't compile (with LilyPond 2.19.60). > >> Please go through this list and if you feel responsible for the snippet > >> please have a look: > >> > >> * notation-snippets/blackmensural-notation > > This one is just a copy of Lukas Pietch's code from January 2011 that I > > was trying to get to work with a recent lilypond. The files have been > > completely superseded by Lukas' more recent work and may safely be > > deleted. > > > > Alas, the more recent version doesn't work either (there is a missing > > file). Full details at > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-05/msg00212.html > > Sorry, I'm not really sure what to think of these two seemingly > contradictory statements. Is it now working *anywhere*? Can I remove the > snippet from the repository? > What exactly should I do?
Sorry if I was unclear. The snippet in your repository should be removed, in my opinion. For lilypond-user's information only: There is a more recent version, at a URL in the message to which I referred; however, until we find/re-invent its missing file, I don't see any point in including it in openlilylib. -- Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user