No objections here too.
Best,
James
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: OLL/snippets renaming (Re: Broken (?) snippets in
> openlilylib/snippets)
> Local Time: July 11, 2017 11:35 AM
> UTC Time: July 11, 2017 2:35 PM
> From: u...@openlilylib.org
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Hi all,
> by now I"ve fixed a number of the below issues and created a few items
> on the issue tracker for the remaining ones.
> Right now I"m wrapping things up a little bit, and part of this is an
> urge to restructure the repository somewhat. In the beginning of the
> repository there was no proper strategy for a directory structure,
> basically whenever someone didn"t immediately know where to put a new
> snippet they decided to create a new directory ;-)
> I would like to rename some directories and move some snippets. In
> particular the "notation-snippets" and the "input-shorthands" seem
> somewhat blurred to me. And, with the nicer syntax of \loadModule I
> would prefer shorter and less redundant names.
> \loadModule snippets.lyrics.align-on-vowels
> is more convenient and expressive than
> \loadModule snippets.notation-snippets.align-lyrics-on-vowels
> etc.
> The question is:
> How many people are actually using the snippets repository, and how much
> inconvenience would that be for these people. I *can* take some care
> about "deprecating" and redirecting includes, but doing this generally
> would actually make the whole thing totally convoluted. So actually I"d
> prefer a clean cut and starting over with a new and cleaner structure.
> Opinions? Objections?
> Urs
> Am 06.07.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I"m wrapping up a number of things in openLilyLib, and I came across
>> snippets where the example files don"t compile (with LilyPond 2.19.60).
>> Please go through this list and if you feel responsible for the snippet
>> please have a look:
>>
>> * notation-snippets/align-lyrics-on-vowels
>> (warning: ignored infinite X-offset)
>> * notation-snippets/alternating-time-signatures
>> (well, that"s me, I"ll keep it as a reference)
>> * notation-snippets/blackmensural-notation
>> * notation-snippets.lyric-syllable-magnetic-snap
>> * notation-snippets.metric-mod
>> * notation-snippets.scale-vertical-spacing
>> * notation-snippets/shaping-bezier-curves/slur-attachments-example.ly
>>
>> * editorial-tools/git-commands
>> (me again)
>> * input-shorthands/easy-octaves
>> * specific-solutions/xelatex-markup-list
>> * templates/predefined-instruments
>>
>> * notation-snippets.scaling-stencils
>> Is this a snippet or an example?
>>
>> * is input-shorthands/sizeContext still necessary or has this been
>> included in Lilypond in the meantime?
>>
>>
>> Maybe this isn"t all that has to be done, I also realized that this
>> repository is very inconsistent in style and quality. However, I want
>> the snippets repository to become a member of the openLilyLib package
>> family, which means that - in addition to the existing style of
>> including the "definitions.ily" files of a directory the stuff can be
>> loaded as "modules".
>>
>> Currently this relies on snippets on the "make-modules" branch and
>> oll-core on the "config" branch, but I intend to merge both in the next
>> days.
>>
>> This will result in input code like for example
>>
>> \include "oll-core/package.ily"
>> \loadPackage page-layout
>> \loadPackage \with {
>> modules = arrows.frames
>> }
>> analysis
>> \loadModule snippets.notation-snippets.compound-slurs
>> \loadModules snippets
>> #"((notation-snippets compound-slurs)
>> (input-shorthands easy-custom-dynamics))
>>
>> An overview of this mechanism can be found on
>> https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core/wiki
>>
>> Going through most of the directory structure made me realize that I
>> would really like to move and rename many modules. For example
>> "easy-custom-dynamics" should not be accessible through
>> snippets.input-shorthands.easy-custom-dynamics
>> but through
>> snippets.notation.custom-dynamics
>> Also there are many verbose directory names that should be shortened:
>> snippets.notation-snippets => snippets.notation etc.
>>
>> The problem is that such a reorganization and renaming would of course
>> break lots of existing files ...
>>
>> Best for now
>> Urs
>>
> --
> u...@openlilylib.org
> https://openlilylib.org
> http://lilypondblog.org
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
