Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > On 20 November 2017 at 12:00, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Is there any (simple) way to rewrite it in a more concise way like >> > this for example? >> > >> > \repeat unfold 7 { >> > \modalTranspose c "c+index" \scale \pattern >> > } >> >> What is simple? >> >> \version "2.18.0" >> >> scale = {c d e f g a b} >> pattern = {c d e f} >> >> \fixed c' { >> #@(map >> (lambda (p) >> #{ \modalTranspose c #(ly:make-pitch -1 p) \scale \pattern #}) >> (iota 8)) >> } > > Thank you David, it works perfectly! > > Is there any way to encapsulate it in a function to avoid to write all the > code any time I need it? What is "all the code"? I really have no idea what makes you consider something simple (and your "explanation" below does not help at all since it is tantamount to "simple depends on the viewer's metrics"). I also have no idea what part of the above you consider "it" to be encapsulated and what you consider variable. > Regarding "simple". Never think seriously about what I mean with "simple". > Maybe: > > Suppose that you know well how to informally solve a problem. Now > suppose you have to describe your solution in a formal and algorithmic > way. > > Between many formal solution I would say that the simplest one is that one > that better overlap the informal solution. > g. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user