On 2018-11-24 7:03 am, Michael Gerdau wrote:
I am curious then as to why it all works fine for me and presumably
others?
Sounds like a Mac font problem to me, given my other current
experience
with Alegreya, as initially raised by Kieren.
Or has 2.19.82 been rebuilt since I downloaded it some time ago?
I may be wrong!
Just checked, and the PDFs on the site have not been changed and are
still broken.
Just looked at the 2.19.82 notation.pdf with my iPhone (read: clearly
no lilypond fonts installed locally) and by briefly browsing through
it I could not detect any broken images.
So I’m not convinced your analysis is completely correct.
Are you sure you are looking at the 2.19.82 version? I would be *very*
surprised to find a PDF viewer that can magically summon fonts from the
aether, because they are very much not there.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation.pdf
Output from pdffonts:
pdffonts notation.pdf | grep -iv "builtin" | head -n 10
name type encoding
emb sub uni object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- ----------------
--- --- --- ---------
Emmentaler-20 Type 1 Custom
no no yes 642 0
TeXGyreSchola-Italic Type 1 WinAnsi
no no no 645 0
Emmentaler-Brace Type 1 Custom
no no no 648 0
Emmentaler-20 Type 1 Custom
no no yes 656 0
TeXGyreSchola-Regular Type 1 WinAnsi
no no no 658 0
Emmentaler-Brace Type 1 Custom
no no no 661 0
Emmentaler-20 Type 1 Custom
no no no 668 0
Emmentaler-20 Type 1 Custom
no no no 678 0
-- Aaron Hill
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
