Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >> Well, to summarize: >> >> In less than an hour after posting a question / potential bug >> report, there is >> >> - a quick & easy solution provided by an experienced fellow user, >> >> - an explanation and some perspective from the main developer >> working on that part of the code. >> >> Unbeatable. And on top of this, the excellent quality that LilyPond >> produces (which is often remarked upon by students & colleagues that >> see my worksheets containing lots of Lilypond music examples). It's >> simply wonderful to work with this program - thanks so much! > > Hear, hear! And yes, great kudos to all the helpful guys on this > list!
Well, the equivalent of "sure, I agree this sucks" from the "highest level" is not exactly the most brilliant endorsement, even if it may be personally satisfying. Which reminds me of the old joke "I'll believe that Microsoft is able to deliver products that don't suck when they start selling vacuum cleaners". At any rate, nobody will claim in good conscience that LilyPond does not have its dirty corners. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
