Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: >> On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:05, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: >> >>> The snippets should be LGPL for being includable under other licenses, >>> I believe, because the processed part remains in the output, and thus >>> copyrightable. Thus, they play the same role as the Bison skeleton >>> file and GCC libraries. >> >> LSR snippets are public domain already. > > So then this is not an issue, but public domain means that it can be > exploited in ways you may not approve of, therefore LGPL would be > better. But I am not an expert on such matters.
For the snippets, that is a reasonable compromise avoiding the user having reservations and headaches. They are more intended as starting points for your own documents than as cut&dry code. -- David Kastrup
