On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:09 PM Torsten Hämmerle <torsten.haemme...@web.de> wrote:
> As far as I know, some special implementations are using SMuFL fonts, most > notably Dorico's Bravura. These implementations will definitely use > explicit code points. > > But LilyPond's makam.ly is making use of Emmentaler (Feta) glyphs, and, as > David pointed out, may change their code points each time a new glyphs is > inserted somewhere. > > As Emmentaler is constantly growing, you'll probably find the accidentals > in > a different place depending on the LilyPond release you're using. > For that reason, directly specifying code points is quite a bad idea and > that's why you'll have to use glyph names (like > accidentals.sharp.slashslashslash.stem). > > If you still need to know the specific Emmentaler code points regardless of > this, you can have a look into the Emmentaler-20.otf font file (using > *FontForge*, for instance). That is interesting, it is in the Private Use Area of Unicode, same area as Bravura. > All the accidental glyphs available can be > found in LilyPond's Notation Reference Manual, Appendix "A.8 The Emmentaler > font", section "Accidental glyphs" > < > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/the-emmentaler-font.html#accidental-glyphs> > > . > > HTH, > Torsten > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html > >
