Hello Mark, 

Thanks a lot, I looked at the snippets doc and missed that…

Will make good use of it!

JM

> Le 19 mai 2020 à 16:45, Mark Stephen Mrotek <carsonm...@ca.rr.com> a écrit :
> 
> Jacques,
> 
> Look at
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=merge+rests
> 
> Mark
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lilypond-user 
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of 
> Jacques Menu
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:32 AM
> To: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: Rests vertical position problem
> 
> I know I could use \rest to control the placement of rests manually, but this 
> code is created from MusicXML automatically.
> musicxml2ly exhibits the same behaviour as the first score shown, BTW.
> 
> JM
> 
>> Le 19 mai 2020 à 09:25, Jacques Menu <imj-muz...@bluewin.ch> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hello folks,
>> 
>> In the attached example, the \voiceOne and \voiceTwo commands used for the 
>> first score lead to the eigth rests in measure 2 to appear too high.
>> 
>> Removing them as in the second score makes the look more satisfying in this 
>> regard, but then measure 1 gets awful.
>> 
>> Is there a way to use some equivalent of \voiceOne and \voiceTwo 
>> measure-wise in such a case, using it only in measures that have more than 
>> one voice playing?
>> 
>> Thanks for your help!
>> 
>> JM
>> 
>> <PastedGraphic-2.tiff>
>> 
>> <RestsVerticalPositionProblemSubmittedToList.ly>
> 
> 


Reply via email to