> -----Original Message----- > From: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 8:12 AM > To: Karsten Reincke <k.rein...@fodina.de> > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Carl Sorensen <carl.d.soren...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Future of openLilyLib > > Karsten Reincke <k.rein...@fodina.de> writes: > > > Summary: > > > > If I wrote a piece of music using LilyPond Code (for being interpreted > > by the Lilypond interpreter) and if I included OpenLilyLib into my > > code, > > If you include OLL code by copy into your source code. If you use its > advertised interfaces, however, that does not make it part of your code.
I'm not saying I disagree with your interpretation, I'm just curious: are you aware of any legal precedent (in the common-law sense) or law code supporting it? DR
