Dear Karsten and list, On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all(?) of you consider this an untenable if not silly position and that the PDFs and midi-files compiled by Lilypond are never affected by the strong copyleft effect of the GPL. That's good to hear. But I don't understand, why - under this circumstances - it should be garbage to add a respective clarifying statement (the 'include clause' or however you want to name it), if it is at least partially conceivable that such a position will be taken and if all of you do not want to use / establish its consequences. But that's my problem.
I would like to join in asking this question, namely what’s the reason not to add such an ‘include clause’? (Am I correct in gathering that LGPL basically means GPL + such an include clause?)
Best, Simon
