>> Attached is an image from the Urtext edition of Schumann's
>> 'Humoreske', typeset around 2009.
>
> This image would seem to show that Henle's accidentals have diverged
> quite a lot from LP's. In this Schumann example the sharp's
> vertical lines are considerably longer and the glyph is narrower,
> and the slope of the natural beams is also quite a lot steeper.
Yes. LilyPond is not a clone of Henle.
I was wondering, too, whether it makes sense to make the sharp glyph
narrower by default. There are always situations with insufficient
horizontal space...
Werner
