Thanks for trying! Laurie Savage On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 20:59, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Laurie Savage <savage.lau...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Thanks David, > > > > I think I'll stay with Frescobaldi! Emacs doesn't seem to edit .ly files > > any more easily so there isn't much advantage in tweaking it to behave > with > > my customised Include files. As for your question about where I found the > > documentation for the location of my Includes: Options > Customise Emacs > -> > > All Settings Matching > "lilypond". > > > > It's a shame, I found Emacs to be the best LaTeX editor I tried. > > Yes, there is really no comparison. > > Emacs has better MIDI recognition than Frescobaldi, and editing > Scheme-only files is nicer. And it blows the socks off anything as a > viewer for Lilypond's Info documentation. > > I use Emacs for editing LilyPond because I am used to working with Emacs > for everything. But the LilyPond mode is really not holding a candle to > what Frescobaldi offers. > > -- > David Kastrup >
