> On 3 Mar 2024, at 17:26, Martin Tarenskeen <m.tarensk...@kpnmail.nl> wrote:
>
>
> Hi LilyPonders,
>
> I bumped into a situation similar to this tiny example (In the real score the
> linebreak happened at such a situation without a forced \break but the result
> was the same):
>
> \relative c' {
> c4 c c cis ~ |
> \break
> cis cis cis d |
> }
>
> the sharp sign in the 2nd bar is printed twice. I am not sure if that's the
> correct behaviour?
> Without a \break the sharp is not printed for the tied 1st cis in the 2nd
> bar, and only repeated for the 2nd cis in the 2nd bar.
> I can imagine the reason to print the sharp sign after a linebreak and/or
> pagebreak. But in such a case I would not repeat the sharp on the snd quarter.
The proposed behavior by Elain Gould in Behind bars (p 80) is to have a single
sharp, without braces, on the second line before the tied note.
>
> Is this a bug or a discussable way to interpret the conventions?
> And: how can I override the current behaviour and choose where to print or
> not print sharps whenever I want to?
>
> MT
>
>
> <test-tie.pdf>
> <test-tie.ly>
