Thank you all for your really quick response. > It is interesting how we interpreted the clef and key signature differently
Sorry for the confusion. The example was actually from: https://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ImagefromIndex/16500/wc13 Thanks again! Jun > 2024/05/21 23:24、David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>のメール: > > Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com <mailto:lilyp...@hillvisions.com>> > writes: > >> On 2024-05-21 6:40 am, Jun Tamura wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Could someone give me a pointer for this? >>> This is a quite popular notation for bowed string instruments. I’m >>> almost certain that I saw a way to achieve this before but could not >>> find it this time. >> >> >> What you typically do is \tweak the duration-log property of the >> notehead you want to change. In the example you provided, begin with >> all notes simply as half-notes. The only notehead you need to adjust >> will be the low one. >> >> %%%% >> \version "2.25.13" >> >> { >> \clef bass \omit Staff.Clef >> \omit Staff.TimeSignature >> \stemDown >> >> <\tweak duration-log 2 d, d a>2 >> <\tweak duration-log 2 d a f'>2 >> <\tweak duration-log 2 e, c e>2 \fermata >> } >> %%%% > > Frankly, someone™ should put in the work to make > > \version "2.25.13" > > { > \clef bass \omit Staff.Clef > \omit Staff.TimeSignature > \stemDown > > << d,4 d2 a >> > << d4 a2 f' >> > << e,4 c2 e \fermata >> > } > %%%% > > just work. There is an additional bit of ickiness for per-note > articulations as compared to per-chord articulations since per-note > articulations would require an extra < > bracketing around the note in > question in addition to << >> around the chord. > > Also you need to take care when using that construct in \relative since > < ... > conveys the _first_ pitch in the chord as the current relative > pitch to the next note while << ... >> conveys the _last_ pitch. So > switching between the two does involve some editing. > > -- > David Kastrup
