Probably becasause I'm unaware of them. I spend my spare time arranging music and getting ready for gigs.
If there are "canned" macro processors that can do this then I should look into learning one of them. And if thats the case then maybe the developers time would be better off being spent on core LP enhancements instead of macros. I will Google for something that may work for me. Thanks Erik Sandberg wrote: > > Citerar "Rick Hansen (aka RickH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> Macro pre-processors should generate source code, and stream it in, >> period. >> >> I just want to output strings into the input stream dynamically, that >> goes >> beyond \include files and offers concat, replacement of tokens, and some >> rudimentary logical constructs, etc. at PRE-compile-time, empasize at >> PRE-COMPILE-TIME. > > Why don't you use an existing general-purpose preprocessor (m4, cpp, gpp, > ..)? > > Erik > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Macro-pre-processing--t1406795.html#a4197956 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user