On Wednesday 10 May 2006 08:11, Simon Dahlbacka wrote: > On 5/10/06, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 08 May 2006 19:30, Arjan Bos wrote: > > > On 6 mei 2006, at 21:20, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > > Quoting Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> On Tuesday 02 May 2006 09:06, Tomas Valusek wrote: > > > > > > > > Or the context hierarchy or which engravers are included in each > > > > context > > > > or which objects are created by which engraver (or context) or ... > > > > > > What I would like to see is a model of all the data being used within > > > LilyPond, > > > > There's a lot of data used in lily. It would require quite some effort to > > build the model you're suggesting, and someone would need to maintain the > > model (which is changing all the time). I think all the current > > developers have better things to do, but I nothing stops you from writing > > such documentation. > > the only sane way to do such a thing would be to auto-generate the data by > parsing the source or something so it would be updated "with the click of a > button". Personally, I don't have the extra time to build such a scraping > tool..
Such documentation exists, see Program Reference in the manual. -- Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user