Rune Zedeler wrote:
Graham Percival skrev:
LIMITED DISCUSSION
To keep discussion focused and as un-confused as possible, this is a
discussion *only* about the arrangement of subsections. Other parts of
GDP will be discussed later.
This means:
- propose new/changed chapter/sections
- propose renamings of chapter/sections
- *do not* discuss new subsections or renamings of subsections. That
will come later.
Sorry I do not understand what you mean.
How can we discuss "arrangement of subsections" without discussing new
subsections or renaming of subsections?
Like this:
"6.1.8 rests and 6.1.9 should not be part of 6.1 pitches, because
they're not real notes. Move them to 6.3 rhythms instead"
or
"9.3 Vocal music is too large. Split it up into:
9.3 Adding lyrics
9.3.1 Setting simple songs
9.3.2 Entering lyrics.
...
and
9.4 Multiple stanzas and aligning lyrics
9.4.1 foo
9.4.2 bar
...
Also, 9.3.8 Ambitus should be moved into chapter 7"
In other words, treat the subsections as atoms (indivisible parts) and
form them into new structures.
The reasons:
- I don't want new proposed subsections right now, since writing new
docs takes a lot more work than rearranging docs. We'll tackle this
step in about a week, once I know how much help we have
- I don't want renamed subsections yet, so that it's easy for everybody
to compare the new arrangement with the current one. When we start
renaming subsections, it gets much more complicated.
Btw: Chapters are the ones with one number, sections are the ones with
two numbers and subsections are the ones with tre numbers, right?
Yes, sorry. I should have explained that.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
