Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Just one general comment for the moment: I'd rather propose longer than
shorter subsections. I think that there already is too much fragmentation
at some places for the moment, which means that you never get the chance
to see the full picture as a reader.
Interesting suggestion; I was obviously thinking opposite to this -- for
example, consider splitting Dynamics into (absolute) and (crescendi).
My motivation is that some people clearly hadn't read the whole doc
subsection, and that having shorter subsections would make people more
likely to read the whole thing.
Any other comments about this? I'm not convinced either way, but this
is something we should definitely decide before getting into more
details about a rearrangement.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
