Graham Percival wrote on 08 November 2007 12:26 > > Trevor Daniels wrote: > >> Actually, \fatText _is_ simply an arcane override > >> > -- but one which the > >> > developers thought was so common that they > >> > included a predefined > >> > variable. > > > > The difference exactly. That's why I think this > > predefined variable should be in the main text. > > No, absolutely not. That would be the *worst* > possible thing to do. > (below) > I think we have misunderstood each other. I said: > > > > I agree entirely. A ref to the explanation is > > all that is required. > In other words say what \fattext _does_ in the main text but do not mention how it does it. Most people don't care _how_ it works, but most people will certainly need to _use_ it at some time. Perhaps I misunderstood you, but I took your earlier note to mean the command should be relegated to @commonprop. I'm saying it should be in the main text, but without any explanation of the underlying mechanism anywhere in the NR - just a ref to the source code. That needs less effort, not more.
> Cheers, > - Graham > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
