I'll warn you that you'll have a very hard time convincing me. ;-)
p.s.
Perhaps the best way to convince me is to clarify the difference --
in terms of how it's presented in the Lilypond documentation --
between the "octave transposition" represented by
\transpose c c'/c, { a b c d e f g c }
and the "octave transposition" represented by
#(set-octavation +/- 1) a b c d e f g c
Thanks,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
