On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:00:57 +0100
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > lilypond-book --out=/tmp/ foo.lytex
> >
> > should imply -I=/tmp/ otherwise lilypnod-book will never find
> > foo.tex and will then always recreate foo.tex.
> > (alternately, just improve the searching for the old .tex file)
> >
> >
> I don't exactly understand what problem you are referring to. Is it
> that you have lines like
> \input{includedfile}
> or
> \input{includedfile.lytex}
No; just take the simplest possible .lytex file (such as the
template from the docs). Run
lilypond-book --pdf --out=/tmp foo.lytex
lilypond-book --pdf --out=/tmp foo.lytex
Both times, it compiles all the lilypond snippets and creates a
new foo.tex in /tmp/. I think this is because lilypnod-book looks
for a foo.tex in the same directory, instead of looking in the
output directory.
If you add -I=/tmp/ then lilypond-book won't recompile all the
snippets on the second (idential) run. This works fine for me,
but since John's familiar with lilypnod-book, python, and was
offering, I figured it was worth mentioning.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
