Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 10. März 2008 schrieb David Bobroff:
Um, no, not at all. That's not the problem.
If you could describe in a little more detail what you are trying to do (i.e.
what are your cue voices, clefs, transposing instruments, etc.), we might be
better able to help you come up with the proper solution...
Well, specifically, I'm preparing a transposed, or rather de-transposed,
tenor tuba part for "Don Quixote" of R. Strauss. The original part is
in bass clef but in a Bb transposition. I'm keeping it in bass clef but
transposing it down a step. This is no problem. Furthermore, I'm
including all the original cues at their original notated pitches. All
the cues are in a separate definition block. I ran into a problem when
I decided it would be interesting to also create a Bb Treble clef
notated version while at the same time retaining all the original cues
at their original pitches and clefs. It seems that I do *not* need to
change all the cues from \relative to absolute. All I need to do is
place a few more explicit clef changes at points where in the original
there were not clef changes between the cues and the main part. If the
clef remains the same then Lily will not print a new clef. If it
changes, then it does.
-David
Looking at it some more it
seems that what I need is more clef changes in and out of the cues in
order to insure that different transpositions of the main part,including
transpositions involving different clefs will produce the results I'm
after.
Ah, so you are actually trying to print cue notes in different clefs? See the
snippet:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=388
If you don't need cue instrument names, you can simply remove them from the
definition of the cleffedCueDuring and setClefCue functions.
BTW, if you really need to convert some transposed music from relative to
absolute, make sure to check whether the output of \displayLilyMusic (see
section 3.3.1 of the lilypond manual for version 2.11) produces what you
need... It helped me a lot when I realized I had entered a long section in
the wrong pitch (you know, 18th century alto/soprano clefs...). The only
thing that is wrong in the output are bar number checks.
Cheers,
Reinhold
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
* K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
* Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH1b0XTqjEwhXvPN0RAt4zAJ0fkYRWXJJBPS+Y7YGaH7N+COpohgCcCplj
6QrxaAvwwcT9Sr8pPrmYM2U=
=Q9bt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user