Valentin Villenave wrote: > > Windows users seem to > believe that .mid is more legitimate than .midi, but non-MS users are > used to non-three-letters extensions. >
It is not a matter of belief but rather a matter of practicality... Many applications that import MIDI files for post processing (for example, BIAB or Jammer Pro) will not accept .midi as a valid extension. Their internal 'filtering' will just not allow import. The use of a batch file along the lines proposed by Karl should provide a satisfactory workaround. Thanks Karl. Don -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/*.mid-vs-*.midi-tp17235029p17253856.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
