Checking a bit more carefully, I can confirm that it's \tiny (i.e.
font-size -2) that gives the
correct size.
/Mats
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
You are right, the markup should probably be
\markup {\tiny \number 6 \super (1) }
instead of
\markup {\number 6 \super (1) }
I didn't manage to decipher exactly how the font size setting is done
for the normal bass figures,
but using \tiny or \small for the markup seems to give a size that
better matches the rest of the
figures.
Valentine, can you change the snippet?
/Mats
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
<NITPICKING-OT>
2008/10/16 Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Difficult modern concepts are much easier in Lilypond than the
others, e.g.
figured bass:
<http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=291>
Just out of curiosity (I don't know anything about figures bass)... :-)
Is the number 6 on the second beat of the 4th (second last) measure
really meant to be larger than the rest of the numbers? Or is it just
the \markup that makes it bigger by default if the size isn't
specified?
-Risto
</NITPICKING-OT>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
School of Electrical Engineering
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user