Graham Percival wrote: >> One thing your snippet doesn't display -- time signatures of the form, >> >> 3+3+2 >> 8 >> >> Is this possible? > > Yes, see the very first message in this thread!
Forgive me, that was badly phrased. What I was really meaning to ask was if you could add this second case as an extra example to the snippet -- I think it's important to give the two different versions as they are both widely used notations. (They could also be interpreted somewhat differently: I would probably use 3/8 + 3/8 + 2/8 where I intended the compound elements to be less 'joined' than 3+3+2/8.) > Again, see the first message in this thread, or even better, the > "improved elegant time signatures" (or some similar subject) email > I sent a few hours later. OK, I think I see now in principle how these things can be done with your method. Again, what my request should really be interpreted to mean is, can some such cases be added to the documentation snippet -- but I recognise you have limited time. I don't think I have the second email you sent ... ? I only have emails with the same subject as this mail. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
