On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:36:20PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 20 Oct 2008, at 11:21, Graham Percival wrote: > >> Hans: at the risk of sounding grumpy, did you try compiling my >> example? I believe it does everything you want. > > Yes, I think it was clear from my reply. I mentioned that although > writing in each measure > \unset subdivideBeams > \unset beatLength > does the job, it is a bit cumbersome.
Ah, that's what you meant by "It is though too complicated to wrte stuff i each measure" [sic]. Sorry. > The second problem is that LilyPond beamings varies quite a bit from > version to version, so sprinkling, so this solution may not be stable. This shouldn't be a problem if you set up the overrides correctly, and as long as there aren't any regression bugs. > There is a need of a more general beaming pattern selection scheme. To be picky, this is a problem about subdivided beams, not the main beams. Anyway, it's true that something this complicated would require some scheme programming. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user