Graham Percival wrote:
In defense of Jonathan, his responses *were* accurate; they were just too polite. I mean, they were accurate and looked accurate, but it invited a discussion about file syntax. We've spent about
Thanks Graham. I just sent an email defending myself but it's nice to get confirmation :)
2.11 docs -- we just aren't consistent in saying "read the 2.11 docs instead of 2.10".
Agreed. I'll try to make a habit of this. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
