Am 08.12.2008 um 19:06 schrieb Trevor Bača:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:06 AM, james <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
After much searching, I found it. Fontbook installs user-installed
fonts to a directory that isn't indexed by fontconfig ~/Library/
Fonts. After I realised that, I knew to tell fontbook to install my
fonts system-wide, apparently, osx doesn't use ~/.fonts/ which
fontconfig does index.
Hi James,
Glad everything worked out. I've had to solve this same problem a
couple of times under OS X 10.4 myself. The post here ...
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-02/
msg00087.html
... basically says "you can copy stuff to ~./fonts" to solve the
problem. A better solution is just sym linking, which Han-Wen
points out later in the thread.
Since I already have a solution that works for me, the question is
pure curiosity, but what's better about sym linking? And is that
better than telling fontbook to install fonts system-wide, or better
than copying fonts to ~/.fonts/ or both?_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
