Trevor Daniels wrote:
Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what
I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn
subdivideBeams on and off as required.
Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic
subdivision of beams even more flexible, with separate rules for
different note lengths, or would the resulting scheme get too messy to
use and implement?
/Mats
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
