On 3/19/09 11:56 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote:
>>> You mean, using
>>> #(override-auto-beam-setting '(subdivide 1 32 3 4) 1 8)
>>> to get a subdivision after the first four 32nd notes in 3/4
>>> meter? Good
>>> idea!
>>
>> Actually, that's not what I meant. But it's what I should have
>> meant. So I
>> guess I should have meant that. I'm glad people smarter than me
>> are around
>> to pick up the pieces!
>
> I'd go along with this. If the new subdivide rules didn't
> inhibit the beatGrouping rules it would make it easier for
> users to override the defaults, since we could remove some
> of the beam-ending rules and replace them with subdivide
> rules and still get acceptable beaming out of the box, with
> fewer reverts being needed.
>
> BTW, did we ever file a feature request for a function to
> revert all the beam-ending rules in a particular time
> signature? This would also be very useful.
I don't think we ever filed a feature request, but I think that Nicolas gave
us such a function, IIRC.
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user