Greetings,
If your objection to LWN is re: someone else's comment on my articles,
then that's fine with me. But if anyone has a problem with my articles
per se I'd prefer they take it up with me, not with my publishers.
Of course it should be obvious from these articles just how I feel about
LilyPond :
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/music-notation-software-linux-progress-report-part-1
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/music-notation-programs-recent-releases
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8629 "Music Notation Software For
Linux, Part 1"
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8670 "Music Notation Software For
Linux Part 2"
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8738 "Music Notation Software For
Linux, Part 3"
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8972 "Music Notation Software For
Linux, Part 4"
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7657 "LilyPond, Part 1"
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7719 "LilyPond, Part 2"
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8928 "LilyPond Helper Applications"
Best regards,
Dave Phillips
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
