On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Graham Percival
<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:

> As for LilyPond vs. Sibelius: if we do it, we should do it
> objectively.  One thing we might do in the new website is to have
> examples of notation from the latest software (lilypond stable,
> finale 20XY, sibelius 20AB, etc) and point out flaws in the
> default output.  We could then point out the ease (or not!) of
> fixing said problems.

It would be nice to update the finale 2003 comparison on lilypond.org;
I hear Finale has improved since, but so has the lilypond output.


-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to