On 4/10/09 5:54 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" <reinh...@kainhofer.com> wrote:
> On Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009 09:25:57 Frédéric Bron wrote:
>> I am in charge of the question of (de)crescendo syntax issue in 2.12.2.
>
> Okay, sorry if I'm working on the same issue as you now, but I simply got too
> frustrated with hundreds of pages of old scores suddenly changing
> cresc/hairpin behavior (they were created with 2.10 and now I've started
> revising them with 2.12...) and the huge work I have now with cross-checking
> every cresc/dim/hairpin.
>
> So, I took a look at the issue today and created a patch, which will now allow
> all dynamic spanner starters to be implemented as postfix-operators.
>
>
> Attached is a sample file to show how the definition of spanners could work
> with my patch. I've also implemented two functions to give the text of the
> spanner directly in the postfix call.
>
> Any comments / objections / suggestions?
Looks good to me. Got at the essential issues in a very straightforward
way.
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
