Peter Chubb wrote:
"Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammost...@gmail.com> writes:
Grammostola> But I got this message:
Grammostola> d...@debian:~/lilypondfiles$ lilywrap lilywraptest.ly
Grammostola> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: unrecognized
Grammostola> option: `--midi'
Here's an updated lilywrap script.
You don't actually have to use lilywrap: all it does is insert
\include "articulate.ly"
near the top of the file, and insert
\unfoldRepeats \articulate
around the main part of the score. In fact, in the general case,
you're better off adding it all by hand --- especially if there is
anything between the \score{ and the first bit of real music.
Thanks!
@ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could improve the midi output by
default. I can remember I mentioned this before, but one comment (not
from you) was that Lilypond was mainly a notation typesetter... And
while been busy with the lilywrap script, I was thinking, ok maybe
that's right, but what is wrong with having both, e.g. good lay-out and
good midi output?
Regards,
\r
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
