On 07/09/10 23:55, David Rogers wrote: > * Matthias Kilian <k...@outback.escape.de> [2010-09-07 22:22]: > >> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:10:59PM -0700, David Rogers wrote: >>> I really only see two requests for change, which pop up again and >>> again; >>> those are of course the two recently discussed - making the list the >>> default reply-to address, and prefixing the subject line. >> >> Graham already said that this will not change. Go figure out why. > > > :-) Nice. > > It's easy to see that only the published standards are pedantically > correct in all cases. That wasn't my point. I argue that "not > pedantically correct in all cases, but easier to use ninety-five percent > of the time and easy to fix the other five" is a better solution. I > don't run this list, and I know who does, so I was already aware of > where I would be asked to put my opinion. Doesn't mean I don't have one. > :) > If your changes make it "easier to use 95% of the time", then why are - I would guess about 50% - of the responses to this thread saying "it works as it is, don't change it" ?
I think the evidence is against you ... Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
