On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Lilypond would see if that were the case.
What, are you implying that LilyPond should decide that #1: a~ b ...means a slur BUT #2: \set tieWaitForNote = ##t a~ b c d | e1 | a, ...means a tie BUT #3: a~ b c d [insert 42 measures here without an a] a ...doesn't actually mean a tie, but should be treated as a slur instead? This seems haphazard to me. Perhaps I misunderstood your comment? Cheers, Valentin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
