2010/11/14 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> > Valentin Villenave <valen...@villenave.net> writes: > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Means a tie, as indicated by the user. > > > > Oh. So, setting tieWaitForNote would disable the "automatic-slurs" > > feature? > > They would be mutually exclusive, and both off by default, resulting in > a warning instead. > > >> Means bad input. Configurable to be treated as a slur to b. > > > > Then it would no longer be "bad input", would it? > > Correct. > > > My main concern is that such a change would amount to make the input > > syntax more "fault-tolerant", which isn't the direction we've been > > taking so far. > > As long as it is not the default. > > > That being said, unterminated ties are currently allowed and do not > > produce any warning, so I don't think the current situation is optimal > > either. If anything, we could at least output a "warning: unfinished > > tie. A slur will be printed instead". > > > How does it seems to you? > > I'd rather just warn, unless a specific option is set. I don't think it > makes much sense to both warn and typeset a slur. >
I agree with Marc Hohl - converting wrognly defined ties into slurs should be done by converters. However, the behaviour described above by David would be acceptable to me. cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
