Hi Graham, > IMO, it is the *only* arbiter of (general population) taste.
Not true -- like it or not, there are forces beyond "general population taste" which apply to the Sieve of Time. > While the *only* arbiter of your personal taste is you. Agreed. > IMO, If something "thrives", then it's good stuff. You and I have very different philosophies on persistence. > do you have an objective definition of "good music"? If so, share it. I have a definition which includes non-subjective criteria. But purely objective? Of course not -- I can't imagine there could ever be such a thing. > accept that Elvis[1] produced "better" music than John Cage. Elvis's "best music" *is* better than Cage's "best music" -- what's your point? =) Cheers, Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
